Lung Cancer Screening Improvement Collaborative
Mammography Positioning Improvement Collaborative
Prostate MR Image Quality Improvement Collaborative
Recommendations Follow-Up Improvement Collaborative

Mammography Positioning Improvement Collaborative Materials

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Background

Suboptimal mammography positioning is the primary factor leading to technically inadequate mammograms. Poor mammogram quality contributes to undetected breast cancer. In a single-institution study, only 67% of images met the positioning criteria set forth by the American College of Radiology® (ACR®). (Pal et al., AJR 2018).


Overview

The ACR Mammography Positioning Improvement Collaborative: A Multicenter Improvement Program Within a Learning Network Framework (Pittman et al., JACR 2024)


RSNA 2023 Presentation - ACR Learning Network Mammography Positioning Improvement Collaborative: Facilitating Local Performance Improvement through Shared Learning


Project Management Template


Project Planning

Project Title

Improving Mammography Positioning at {Organization}

Global Aim

To improve breast cancer detection through screening.

Problem StatementMammography positioning is variable and inconsistent possibly leading to missed diagnosis of cancer.
Potential Team Members

Radiologist with a breast imaging clinical focus

Mammography supervisor or manager

Mammography technologist


Collaborative Measure

Measure Specification Documents


Percentage of screening mammograms comprised of four standard views meeting identified mammography positioning criteria.
Guidelines TableMammography Positioning Review Guidelines

SMART Goal

Improve mammography positioning from an average baseline % to goal % by DATE.

Exam Scoring and Control Chart Template

Excel: LN Mammography Exam Review and Control Chart Template

Data Submission

HUB: Mammography Positioning: Data Collection and Control Chart in the Learning Network Hub


Current State Analysis

Use these Mammography Positioning Current State Analysis Questions to plan your Gemba walk.  Observations should be recorded on a cause-and-effect or fishbone diagram and root causes prioritized in a pareto chart.


Key Drivers

The following are common key drivers seen over multiple cohorts. Each project will select Key Drivers, that may or may not be on this list, related to the root causes identified during the Current State Analysis.

  • Developing and maintaining tech skills

  • Clear and consistent communication between techs and rads

  • Agreement on image quality and the evaluation of positioning criteria

  • Clear process for supporting difficult exam

  • Clear and effective communication with patients

  • A standard sustainable way to measure and report image quality

  • Consistent coaching for all technologists


Intervention Resources

ACR 1999 Mammography Quality Control Manual


MAP SOSS Positioning Presentation


ACR Learning Network - PNL Measurements on MLO and CC


RSNA 2023 Presentation - ACR Learning Network Mammography Positioning Improvement Collaborative: Facilitating Local Performance Improvement through Shared Learning


Did you find it helpful? Yes No

Send feedback
Sorry we couldn't be helpful. Help us improve this article with your feedback.