TABLE OF CONTENTS
- Background
- Project Planning
- Collaborative Measure
- Current State Analysis
- Key Drivers
- Intervention Resources
Background
Suboptimal mammography positioning is the primary factor leading to technically inadequate mammograms. Poor mammogram quality contributes to undetected breast cancer. In a single-institution study, only 67% of images met the positioning criteria set forth by the American College of Radiology® (ACR®). (Pal et al., AJR 2018).
Overview
Project Management Template
Project Planning
Project Title | Improving Mammography Positioning at {Organization} |
Global Aim | To improve breast cancer detection through screening. |
Problem Statement | Mammography positioning is variable and inconsistent possibly leading to missed diagnosis of cancer. |
Potential Team Members | Radiologist with a breast imaging clinical focus Mammography supervisor or manager Mammography technologist |
Collaborative Measure
Measure Specification Documents | Percentage of screening mammograms comprised of four standard views meeting identified mammography positioning criteria. |
Guidelines Table | Mammography Positioning Review Guidelines |
SMART Goal | Improve mammography positioning from an average baseline % to goal % by DATE. |
Exam Scoring and Control Chart Template | Excel: LN Mammography Exam Review and Control Chart Template |
Data Submission | HUB: Mammography Positioning: Data Collection and Control Chart in the Learning Network Hub |
Current State Analysis
Use these Mammography Positioning Current State Analysis Questions to plan your Gemba walk. Observations should be recorded on a cause-and-effect or fishbone diagram and root causes prioritized in a pareto chart.
Key Drivers
The following are common key drivers seen over multiple cohorts. Each project will select Key Drivers, that may or may not be on this list, related to the root causes identified during the Current State Analysis.
Developing and maintaining tech skills
Clear and consistent communication between techs and rads
Agreement on image quality and the evaluation of positioning criteria
Clear process for supporting difficult exam
Clear and effective communication with patients
A standard sustainable way to measure and report image quality
Consistent coaching for all technologists
Intervention Resources
ACR 1999 Mammography Quality Control Manual
MAP SOSS Positioning Presentation
ACR Learning Network - PNL Measurements on MLO and CC